Forget JEPI: Goldman's Income Fund Held Its Payment Steady While JEPI's Shrank

The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) has long been a popular choice for investors seeking regular income through covered-call strategies on large U.S. stocks. However, a newer competitor from Goldman Sachs, the Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX), has been showing stronger performance in both total returns and consistency of monthly payments, prompting some investors to reconsider their positions in JEPI.

As of October 2026, a $100,000 investment in GPIX yielded monthly payments of $707.45, contrasting with JEPI's $602.54 for the same investment amount. This difference highlights a significant disparity in returns; over the past year, GPIX delivered a total return of 17.4%, while JEPI managed only 7.9%, resulting in a difference of 9.5 percentage points.

To illustrate the comparison, using the closing prices from October 8, 2026, GPIX was priced at $56.12, while JEPI was at $56.65. With these prices, an investment of $100,000 would translate to 1,781.9 shares of GPIX versus 1,765.23 shares of JEPI. Both funds went ex-dividend on October 1, 2026, with GPIX distributing $0.39702 per share and JEPI providing $0.34134 per share. Notably, JEPI’s payment decreased from $655.64 in September to $602.54 in October, while GPIX's payment remained relatively stable, only slightly shifting from $708.09 to $707.45.

The consistency of monthly payments is crucial for investors relying on this income for expenses. The payments from covered-call funds like these are influenced by the premiums earned from options, which can fluctuate with market volatility. Therefore, having a steady income stream is often more manageable for budgeting purposes.

In terms of year-to-date performance, GPIX has seen a return of 14.1%, significantly outperforming JEPI's 5.08%, marking a lead of 9.02 percentage points. Over the past month, GPIX gained 0.86%, while JEPI experienced a decline of 0.39%. This performance gap is consistent across different time frames, suggesting GPIX has been more resilient in various market conditions.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is set to meet on October 27, 2026, with a decision announcement scheduled for 2:00 PM ET on October 28. While the outcome of this meeting remains uncertain, any interest rate increase could enhance the attractiveness of Treasury bills and money market funds, posing increased competition for equity income funds like JEPI and GPIX. However, such rate changes could also lead to greater market volatility, which might boost the option premiums that both funds can secure, potentially increasing their monthly distributions.

Both GPIX and JEPI utilize similar strategies by selling options on large-cap U.S. stocks, meaning they would be equally affected by any shifts in the interest rate environment. The comparative advantage of GPIX lies in its recent performance, which, while promising, is not yet proven over an extended period.

GPIX was launched on October 26, 2023, and lacks the long-term track record that JEPI has established through various market conditions. While GPIX has outperformed JEPI over its brief history, the longevity of JEPI’s performance may still appeal to investors who prioritize established records over recent gains.

For investors, both funds operate on a covered-call basis, where they sell call options on their stock holdings, generating premiums that fund monthly payments. However, this strategy comes with trade-offs; if the stocks appreciate beyond the strike prices of the options sold, the funds miss out on those gains in exchange for immediate cash flow.

Switching from JEPI to GPIX is straightforward in tax-advantaged accounts like IRAs or 401(k)s, where investors can shift funds without immediate tax implications. However, in taxable accounts, selling JEPI at a profit may lead to capital gains taxes, which could offset the benefits of any additional income from GPIX. Some investors may choose to direct new investments into GPIX while maintaining their JEPI shares or only partially transition their holdings as GPIX builds a longer performance history.

Ultimately, for those with JEPI in tax-advantaged accounts seeking larger and more consistent monthly payouts, GPIX has recently outperformed. However, for investors with significant unrealized gains in JEPI or those who value a longer operating history, the established track record of JEPI may still hold more weight. Should GPIX’s payments become inconsistent or its performance lead diminish, the evaluation between the two funds could shift in favor of JEPI.

For inquiries or corrections regarding this article, please contact [email protected].